With the 79th anniversary of the Social Security Act, retirees (and most workers) worry about its solvency; will it run out of money to pay benefits. What can be done about it?
First a few facts.
- President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Bill into law on August 14, 1935.
- An average of 65 million Americans receive benefits each month, including 47 million retirees and 3 million dependents. The average monthly benefit is $1,555.
- Among elderly beneficiaries 37% of men and 42% of women depend on Social Security for 50 percent or more of their income. Twelve percent of elderly men and 15 percent of elderly women depend on Social Security for 90% or more of their income.
Social Security Changes
Changes coming next year are highlighted by an anticipated huge increase in benefits courtesy of the annual cost-of-living increase.
“I tell people with kids don’t be surprised if for your kids for retirement age is 70 years plus, because it needs to be,” says Beau Henderson, founder of RichLife Advisors in Gainesville, Georgia. “I don’t I don’t think we’re at the end of the road. I think I think it’s going to look very different than what it has for so long.”
“They’re talking about a 10.5% COLA increase for Social Security, just given the rate of inflation that we’re dealing with in the country at the moment,” says James Regan, financial advisor and partner with SharpePoint in Phoenix, Arizona. “That would be historically one of the, if not the highest, COLA benefit increase on Social Security benefits.” That follows a 5.9% adjustment in 2022.
Unless Congress acts, the Social Security Trust Fund will only be able to pay full benefits until 2034,
Social Security Solvency?
But that kind of boost is not sustainable, considering that the solvency of Social Security is already a big question, Regan says. Unless Congress acts, the Social Security Trust Fund will only be able to pay full benefits until 2034, when the fund’s assets will be depleted. After that the fund will only be able to pay current recipients 76% of the benefits they have earned.
Changes are likely to happen to keep Social Security solvent.
“Washington has a horrible habit of not being proactive, but reactive, right up until right before there’s going to be an insolvency date,” says Regan. You kind of get a glimpse of that with these government shutdowns, right. They don’t get it all handled.”
“I don’t think there’s legislation where they can just fund the trust fund because the way that security structured, a lot of it comes to FICA and payroll taxes along with disability fund, and Medicare,” says Regan. “It’s not just like a you can write a blank check and just deposit money into the trust fund that would solve things short term. The real changes that need to come to Social Security are going to be much longer. I’m 40 years old and I think my generation is going to get a very different view, if anything from Social Security.
The annual income of Social Security beneficiaries would be reviewed to determine whether they would receive a reduced benefit or no benefit at all.
Means testing Social Security?
“There has to be changes where they’re encouraging people to defer longer, and maybe deplete more of your savings sooner before you start to claim Social Security benefits,” he says “But I think that for people who have retired who have saved well, and are retired or have decent income or retirement, I do think they’re going to be means tested eventually.” The options:
- Means testing. The annual income of Social Security beneficiaries would be reviewed to determine whether they would receive a reduced benefit or no benefit at all. “For people who have retired who have saved well, and are retired or have decent income or retirement, I do think they’re going to meet tested,” says Regan. “If you’re someone taking Social Security now, you might need to be planning for a reduction in benefits in 2034 especially if you have good income and retirement. And if you have assets, they’re going to tell you to bleed more of your assets by reducing your Social Security benefits.”
- Increasing the retirement age. “That’s all on the table,” says Regan. “They’re going to probably raise the retirement age. Claiming Social Security benefits at 62 could go away. Maybe they raise up to 65 and they move back for retirement age to maybe like 70.”
“I’ve heard proposals of things like continuing to push back the retirement age from 65 all the way to 67,” says Henderson. “I wouldn’t be surprised if the government continues to kick the can down the road so that eventually the full retirement age might be maybe 70. But I think they’ll do that over time. Because by extending the timeline and it keeps the money in the system and keeps it viable.”
- Increasing or removing the earnings cap. The maximum earnings subject to Social Security taxes increased from $142,800 to $147,000. It will increase to $155,100 in 2023. (The cap was $127,200 in 2017.)
“By removing that cap instead just incrementally increasing it would be another big boost for the viability of Social Security?” says Henderson.
“Social Security is delicate,” says Henderson. “I call it the baby you don’t mess with too much – because it’s political suicide to make to make a sharp reduction or take away a benefit from the largest demographic in the country. So, what I’ve seen government do is make these incremental changes to keep it viable for a period of time and kind of kick the can down the road.”
Want to know more about this topic? Two places to try are AARP, and The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.
There’s also this interesting blog post that reminds us that Social Security benefits are already means tested. Read it here.
Stay on top of your finances with Senior Planet from AARP. Join us for live lectures on finance, money management, budgeting tips, and more by checking here. Questions? Call our dedicated help hotline: 888-713-3495.
Rodney A. Brooks is the former deputy managing editor/Money at USA TODAY. His retirement columns appear in U.S. News & World Report and Senior Planet.com. He has written for National Geographic, The Washington Post and USA TODAY. The author of “Fixing the Racial Wealth Gap,” Brooks has testified before the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging. His website is www.rodneyabrooks.com.
Means testing will be the death of Social Security. It would make the program a low income retirement plan and politically one party would start to call the recipients lazy seniors who don’t work for a government handout. It’s a social program not a low income program, do not adjust the benefit, change the funding. It’s not a huge shift to fully fund it for another 60-70 years. Once the demographic hump from the boomers is through it will be much more viable.
Means testing is about the worst idea with Social Security I can think of. Let me give you my situation. I am 69 and my husband is 66 and 9 mos. He will wait until he is 70 to collect. We lived frugally and went without amassing about 4 million dollars and now because I saved I would forfeit my SSI. If based on income, I would advise people never to invest in traditional IRAS as that will count against you for social security. So much more to say but I am running out of characters.
Yes, is a very good article. I do feel STRONGLY that means testing is going to occur in the very near future. There has been a huge push for things like a company match on 401 K to basically set people up to loose that portion of social security income. Other back handed tactics like pre taxed health insurance premiums do the same. There is NO such thing as free money and our politicians on both sides have basically mislead the people.
The article on Social Security is very informative, Keep me posted as things occur.